Improve Patient Experience

CHALLENGES

  • Stressful environment and patient discomfort.
  • Patients want to be autonomous.
  • Clear communication is crucial during times of stress and fear.

SOLUTIONS

INTEGRATED PATIENT CONTROLS

Allows patients to adjust the bed while seated or lying down.

✓ Higher comfort
✓ Effortless adjustments
✓ Increased patient autonomy

THE INTEGRATED USB PORT

Allows patients in the bed to safely and easily charge their phones.

✓ Enhanced patient connectivity
✓ Improved well-being
✓ Sense of normalcy during recovery

ELECTRICAL BED EXTENSION​

The bed platform can be electrically extended by up to 22 cm (8.6 in), enhancing comfort for taller patients.​​

INTEGRATED NURSE CALL SYSTEM​

With a single button on the siderail, the patient can easily activate the nurse call system and communicate with their caregiver.​​

ERGOFRAME®​

Ergoframe® reduces patient discomfort during back and thigh rest positioning.​​


GET IN TOUCH AND LEARN MORE ABOUT MULTICARE

Contact our customer advisor

(1) Daily Cost Of An Intensive Care Unit Day: The Contribution Of Mechanical Ventilation, Daily Cost Of An Intensive Care Unit Day: The Contribution Of Mechanical Ventilation - Pubmed (Nih.Gov)
(2) Titsworth Wl, Et Al. The Effect Of Increased Mobility On Morbidity In The Neurointensive Care Unit. J. Neurosurg. 2012; 116:1379 1388.
(3) Lebeda T Et Al Effect Of Mobi-Lift® On Patients Mobilisation. Nru For Occupational Physiology And Psychophysiology, Report No: 3636/2021, Ex. 210347. Data Upon Request 
(4) Schweickert W, Pohlman M, Pohlman A, Nigos C, Pawlik A, Esbrook C, Spears L, Miller M, Franczyk M, Deprizio D, Schmidt G, Bowman A, Barr R, Mccallister K, Hall J, Kress J (2009) Early Physical And Occupational Therapy In Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet 373:1874–1882.
(5) Davis, K. G., & Kotowski, S. E. (2015). Prevalence Of Musculoskeletal Disorders For Nurses In Hospitals, Long-Term Care Facilities, And Home Health Care: A Comprehensive Review. Human Factors, 57(5), 754–792. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0018720815581933